Factors Associated With Mortality in Patients With Immune-Mediated Rheumatic Diseases and COVID-19 From Latin America: Data From Argentina, Mexico, and Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To describe characteristics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in patients with rheumatic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) from Argentina, Mexico and Brazil, and to assess factors associated with mortality in this population. METHODS: Data from 3 national registries, SAR-COVID (Argentina), CMR-COVID (Mexico), and ReumaCoV-Brasil (Brazil), were combined. Adult patients with IMIDs and SARS-CoV-2 infection were recruited. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, IMID clinical characteristics and treatment, and SARS-CoV-2 infection presentation and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 4827 individuals were included: 2542 (52.7%) from SAR-COVID, 1167 (24.2%) from CMR-COVID, and 1118 (23.1%) from ReumaCoV-Brasil. Overall, 82.1% were female with a mean age of 49.7 (SD, 14.3) years; 22.7% of the patients were hospitalized, and 5.3% died because of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019). Argentina and Brazil had both 4% of mortality and Mexico 9.4%. In the multivariable analysis, older age (≥60 years; odds ratio [OR], 7.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6-12.4), male sex (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1), living in Mexico (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.0-4.4), comorbidity count (1 comorbidity: OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.1), diagnosis of connective tissue disease or vasculitis (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.4), and other diseases (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.6-4.1) compared with inflammatory joint disease, high disease activity (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 2.5-7.0), and treatment with glucocorticoids (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.5) or rituximab (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 2.7-6.6) were associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality in patients with IMIDs was particularly high in Mexicans. Ethnic, environmental, societal factors, and different COVID-19 mitigation measures adopted have probably influenced these results.

Does the Use of Immunosuppressive Drugs Impact on SARS-CoV-2 Infection Outcome? Data From A National Cohort of Patients With Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (SAR-COVID Registry).

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: This study describes the impact of immunomodulatory and/or immunosuppressive (IM/IS) drugs in the outcomes of COVID-19 infection in a cohort of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). METHODS: Adult patients with IMIDs with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. Data were reported by the treating physician between August 13, 2020 and July 31, 2021. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, and DMARDs, as well as clinical characteristics, complications, and treatment of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, were recorded. Descriptive analysis and multivariable logistic regression models were carried out. RESULTS: A total of 1672 patients with IMIDs were included, of whom 1402 were treated with IM/IS drugs. The most frequent diseases were rheumatoid arthritis (47.7%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (18.4%). COVID-19 symptoms were present in 95.2% of the patients. A total of 461 (27.6%) patients were hospitalized, 8.2% were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 4.4% died due to COVID-19.Patients without IM/IS treatment used glucocorticoids less frequently but at higher doses, had higher levels of disease activity, were significantly older, were more frequently hospitalized, admitted to the intensive care unit, and died due to COVID-19. After adjusting for these factors, treatment with IM/IS drugs was not associated with a worse COVID-19 outcome (World Health Organization-Ordinal Scale ≥5) (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-2.06). CONCLUSIONS: SAR-COVID is the first multicenter Argentine registry collecting data from patients with rheumatic diseases and SARS-CoV-2 infection. After adjusting for relevant covariates, treatment with IM/IS drugs was not associated with severe COVID-19 in patients with IMIDs. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT04568421.

Características clínicas y evolución de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico en Argentina: datos del registro nacional SAR-COVID / Clinical characteristics and course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Argentina: data from the SAR-COVID national registry

Introducción: el lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) es una enfermedad sistémica que se ha asociado a mayor severidad con la infección por SARS-CoV-2. Particularmente la alta actividad de la enfermedad y algunos inmunosupresores se han vinculado a peores desenlaces. Objetivos: describir las características por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con LES en Argentina del registro SAR-COVID y establecer los factores asociados a peor desenlace de la misma. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional. Se incluyeron pacientes con diagnóstico de LES con infección confirmada por SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR y/o serología positiva) del registro SAR-COVID. Los datos se recolectaron desde agosto de 2020 hasta marzo de 2022. El desenlace de la infección se midió mediante la escala ordinal de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (EO-OMS). Se definió COVID-19 severo con un valor EO-OMS ≥5. Análisis descriptivo, test T de Student, test de Mann Whitney U, ANOVA, chi2 y Fisher. Regresión logística múltiple. Resultados: se incluyeron 399 pacientes, el 93% de sexo femenino, con una edad media de 40,9 años (DE 12,2). El 39,6% tenía al menos una comorbilidad. Al momento de la infección, el 54,9% recibía glucocorticoides, el 30,8% inmunosupresores y el 3,3% agentes biológicos. La infección por SARS-CoV-2 fue leve en la mayoría de los casos, mientras que un 4,6% tuvo curso severo y/o falleció. Estos últimos presentaban comorbilidades, usaban glucocorticoides y tenían síndrome antifosfolipídico (SAF) con mayor frecuencia y mayor actividad de la enfermedad al momento de la infección. En el análisis multivariado, la hipertensión arterial, el diagnóstico de SAF y el uso de glucocorticoides se asociaron a hospitalización severa y/o muerte por COVID-19 (EO-OMS ≥5). Conclusiones: en esta cohorte de pacientes con LES con infección por SARS-CoV-2 confirmada, la mayoría cursó de manera sintomática, un 22,1% fue hospitalizado y un 5% requirió ventilación mecánica. La mortalidad fue cercana al 3%. El diagnóstico de SAF, tener hipertensión arterial y el uso de glucocorticoides se asociaron significativamente con COVID-19 severo.

Introduction: systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic disease that has been associated with greater severity with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Particularly high disease activity and some immunosuppressants have been linked to worse outcomes. Objectives: to describe the characteristics due to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with SLE in Argentina from the SAR-COVID registry and to establish the factors associated with a worse outcome of the same. Materials and methods: observational study. Patients diagnosed with SLE with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (RT-PCR and/or positive serology) from the SAR-COVID registry were included. Data was collected from August 2020 to March 2022. The outcome of the infection was measured using the World Health Organization - ordinal scale (WHO-OS). Severe COVID-19 was defined as an WHO-OS value ≥5. Descriptive analysis, Student's T test, Mann Whitney U, ANOVA, chi2 and Fisher. Multiple logistic regression. Results: a total of 399 patients were included, 93% female, with a mean age of 40.9 years (SD 12.2), 39.6% had at least one comorbidity. At the time of infection, 54.9% were receiving glucocorticoids, 30.8% immunosuppressants, and 3.3% biological agents. SARS-CoV-2 infection was mild in most cases, while 4.6% had a severe course and/or died. The latter had comorbidities, used glucocorticoids and had antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) more frequently and higher disease activity at the time of infection. In the multivariate analysis, high blood pressure, the diagnosis of APS, and the use of glucocorticoids were associated with severe hospitalization and/or death from COVID-19 (WHO-EO ≥5). Conclusions: in this cohort of SLE patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, most had a symptomatic course, 22.1% were hospitalized, and 5% required mechanical ventilation. Mortality was close to 3%. The diagnosis of APS, having high blood pressure, and the use of glucocorticoids were significantly associated with severe COVID-19.

Frecuencia de comorbilidades en pacientes con artritis psoriásica y evaluación de la adherencia de los médicos a las recomendaciones de tratamiento de las Guías GRAPPA 2015 / Frequency of comorbidities in patients with psoriatic arthritis and evaluation of the adherence of physicians to the treatment recommendations of the GRAPPA 2015 Guidelines

Introducción: los pacientes con artritis psoriásica (APs) presentan más comorbilidades. Las guías del Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) establecen lineamientos para los tratamientos de acuerdo a ellas. Objetivos: describir la prevalencia de comorbilidades en pacientes con APs según el Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index (RDCI), analizar el efecto sobre la enfermedad y estudiar la adherencia a las guías GRAPPA. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional. Se incluyeron pacientes con APs de la cohorte RAPSODIA. Se reportaron características sociodemográficas y clínicas. Las comorbilidades se valoraron por RDCI. Se estudiaron variables asociadas a RDCI ≥1 mediante análisis multivariado. Se analizó el cumplimiento de las recomendaciones de tratamiento en relación a las comorbilidades según las guías GRAPPA. Resultados: se incluyeron 170 pacientes. El 67,6% presentó al menos una comorbilidad (RDCI ≥1); estos eran de mayor edad (X 57,3±12,7 años vs. 48,2±13,2 años; p<0,0001), presentaban más sobrepeso u obesidad (84,3% vs. 67,3%; p=0,011) y peor calidad de vida (PsAQoL X 7,6±6,6 vs. 5,2±6; p=0,025). El análisis multivariado evidenció asociación de la edad y el uso de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINEs) con RDCI ≥1. Contrariamente a las recomendaciones de GRAPPA, el 70% de los pacientes con cardiopatía utilizaba AINEs, y la mitad de aquellos con enfermedades hepáticas o renales tomaba AINEs o metotrexato. Conclusiones: la prevalencia de comorbilidades en los pacientes con APs es alta. En algunos casos no se cumplían las recomendaciones de tratamiento en relación a las comorbilidades.

Introduction: comorbidities are common in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The GRAPPA (Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis) guidelines strengthen the choice of treatments according to them. Objetives: to describe the prevalence of comorbidities in patients with psoriatic arthritis according to Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index (RDCI) and to analyze the influence of them on disease activity, functional capacity and quality life and to assess adherence to GRAPPA 2015 treatment recommendations according to the presence of comorbidities. Materials and methods: adult patients with PsA (CASPAR criteria) from the RAPSODIA cohort were included. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, disease activity and current treatment were recorded. Comorbidities were assessed by the RDCI. Variables associated with RDCI≥1 were studied by multivariate analysis. Adherence to treatment recommendations in relation to the reported comorbidities was analyzed according to the 2015 GRAPPA guidelines. Results: a total of 170 patients were included. Patients with RDCI ≥1 were reported by 67.6%. These patients were older (57±13 years vs 48±13 years, p<0.0001), had a higher frequency of overweight or obesity (84.3% vs 67.3%, p=0.011), and had a poorer quality of life (PsAQoL 7.6±6.6 vs 5.2±6, p=0.025). The multivariate analysis showed an association between age and the use of NSAIDs with RDCI≥1. Contrary to GRAPPA recommendations, 70% of patients with heart disease were using NSAIDs. Moreover, about half of those with hepatic or kidney disease took NSAIDs or methotrexate. Conclusions: most patients with PsA presented at least one comorbidity. GRAPPA recommendations were not followed in a considerable number of patients.

A useful tool to assess quality of LIFE in rheumatoid arthritis patients that does not require a license: QOL-RA II.

To validate the Quality of Life-Rheumatoid Arthritis Scale II (QOL-RA II) in an Argentinean cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients ≥ 18 years old, with a diagnosis of RA according to ACR-EULAR 2010 criteria, were included in a cross-sectional study. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, RA characteristics, disease activity, and current treatment were registered. Questionnaires were administered, including EQ-5D-3 L, QOL-RA II, HAQ-A, and PHQ-9. The QOL-RA II was re-administered in 20 patients to evaluate reproducibility. Four hundred and thirty patients were included. Median QOL-RA was 6.6 (IQR 5.3-8). Mean time to complete it was 1.7 ± 0.57 min and to calculate it was 12 ± 1.7 s. It showed very good reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.97), reproducibility (ICC, 0.96), and good correlation between the different items and the total questionnaire, without evidence of redundancy. Besides, QOL-RA II presented good correlation with EQ-5D-3L (Rho, 0.6) and moderate with DAS28 (Rho, 0.38), and CDAI (Rho, 0.46). Worse quality of life was observed in patients not doing physical activity, unemployed, and current smokers. Patients with higher disease activity had a significant poorer quality of life. Adjusting by age, sex and disease duration, unemployment, higher disease activity, disability, and the presence of depression were independently associated to worse quality of life. QOL-RA II demonstrated good construct validity, reproducibility, and reliability. It was easy to complete and calculate and does not require a license for its use, thus making it the optimal tool for assessing the quality of life in Spanish-speaking patients with RA. Key Points • The evaluation of quality of life is very important in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. • Most of the questionnaires used to assess the quality of life require a license to use. • QOL-RA II is a valid and simple questionnaire to evaluate the quality of life of patients with RA and does not require a license for its use.

La depresión es un determinante mayor de la capacidad funcional en pacientes con artritis reumatoidea, independientemente de la actividad de la enfermedad / Depression is a major driver of functional capacity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis regardless of disease activity

La depresión es una de las comorbilidades más frecuentemente reportadas en pacientes con Artritis Reumatoidea (AR). Su presencia se asocia a mayores costos de salud, mayor mortalidad y reduce las probabilidades de alcanzar una buena respuesta al tratamiento. Objetivo: Evaluar la prevalencia de depresión en pacientes argentinos con AR y establecer su relación con diferentes factores sociodemográficos y clínicos. Material y métodos: Se incluyeron pacientes ≥18 años de edad, con diagnóstico de AR según criterios ACR-EULAR 2010. Se consignaron datos sociodemográficos, comorbilidades, características clínicas, actividad de la enfermedad y tratamiento actual. Se administraron los cuestionarios EQ-5D-3L, QOL-RA, HAQ-A y PHQ-9. Los valores de PHQ-9 de 5-9, 10-14, 15-19 y ≥20 determinan la presencia de depresión leve, moderada, moderada/severa y severa, respectivamente y un valor de corte ≥10, depresión mayor. Análisis estadístico: Test T de Student, ANOVA y Chi². Regresión lineal múltiple. Resultados: Se incluyeron 258 pacientes, con un tiempo mediano (m) de evolución de la enfermedad de 9 años (RIC 3,6-16,7). La m de depresión valorada por PHQ-9 de 6 (RIC 2-12,5). La prevalencia de depresión mayor fue de 33,8%. Sesenta y seis (25,6%), 42 (16,3%), 27 (10,5%) y 18 (7%) pacientes presentaron depresión leve, moderada, moderada/severa y severa, respectivamente. Los pacientes con depresión mayor mostraron menor capacidad funcional (HAQ-A X1,6±0,8 vs X0,7±0,7, p <0,0001), peor calidad de vida (QOL-RA X5,4±1,8 vs X7,3±1,6, p <0,0001), más dolor (EVN X56,2±27,5 mm vs X33,4±25,7 mm, p <0,0001), mayor actividad de la enfermedad (DAS28-ERS X4,3±1,4 vs X3,3±1,3, p <0,0001), mayor frecuencia de desempleo (71% vs 29%, p=0,015 ) y de comorbilidades (67% vs 33%, p=0,017) y menor frecuencia de actividad física (22% vs 35%, p=0,032). En el análisis multivariado, peor capacidad funcional (OR: 2,1, IC 95%: 1,6-4,3, p <0,0001) y calidad de vida (OR: 0,7, IC 95%: 0,5-0,8, p <0,0001) se asociaron independientemente a la presencia de depresión mayor. Conclusiones: La prevalencia de depresión mayor medida por PHQ-9 en esta cohorte argentina de pacientes con AR fue de 33,8%. La presencia de depresión tiene un impacto negativo sobre la capacidad funcional y la calidad de vida de estos pacientes, independientemente de la actividad de la enfermedad.

Depression is one of the most frequent comorbidity in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). It's presence is associated with higher healthcare costs, mortality rate and reduced odds of achieving a good treatment response. Objective: To determine the prevalence of depression in Argentinean patients with RA and to establish its relationship with different sociodemographic and clinical factors. Material and methods: Consecutive patients ≥18 years old, with a diagnosis of RA according to ACR-EULAR 2010 criteria were included. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, RA characteristics, disease activity and current treatment were registered. Questionnaires were administered: EQ-5D-3L, QOL-RA, HAQ-A and PHQ-9. PHQ-9 scores of 5-9, 10-14, 15-19, ≥20 represent mild, moderate, moderate/severe and severe depression, respectively and a cut-off value ≥10, major depression. Statistical analysis: Student's T, ANOVA and Chi² tests. Multiple logistic regression. Results: 258 patients were included, with a median (m) disease duration of 9 years (IQR 3.6-16.7). The m PHQ-9 score was 6 (IQR 2-12.3). The prevalence of major depression was 33.8%. 66 (25.6%), 42 (16.3%), 27 (10.5%) and 18 (7%) patients presented mild, moderate, moderate/severe and severe depression, respectively. Patients with mayor depression had worse functional capacity (HAQ-A X 1.6±0.8 vs X 0.7±0.7, p <0.0001), poorer quality of life (QOL-RA X 5.4±1.8 vs X 7.3±1.6, p <0.0001), greater pain (NVS X 56.2±27.5 mm vs X 33.4±25.7 mm, p <0.0001), higher disease activity (DAS28-ESR X 4.3±1.4 vs X 3.3±1.3, p <0.0001), higher frequency of unemployment (71% vs 29%, p=0.015 ) and comorbidities (67% vs 33%, p=0.017) and lower frequency of physical activity (22% vs 35%, p=0.032). In the multivariate analysis, patients with moderate and severe depression had worse functional capacity (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.6-4.3, p <0.0001) and quality of life (OR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5-0.8, p <0.0001), independently of disease activity. Conclusion: The prevalence of mayor depression in this Argentinean cohort of patients with RA was 33.8%. The presence of depression had a negative impact on functional capacity and quality of life regardless of disease activity.

Una nueva herramienta para valorar la calidad de vida de pacientes con artritis reumatoidea que no requiere licencia: el cuestionario QOL-RA II (Quality of Life-Rheumatoid Arthritis Scale-II) / A new tool to assess quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis that does not require a license: QOL-RA II (Quality of Life-Rheumatoid Arthritis Scale-II)

Recientemente, validamos el cuestionario Quality of Life-Rheumatoid Arthritis Scale (QOL-RA) y detectamos la presencia de algunas limitaciones. Por esta razón, con la autorización de la autora, cambiamos dos preguntas y desarrollamos una nueva versión en español: el QOL-RA II. Objetivo: Validar el QOL-RA II en una cohorte argentina de pacientes con Artritis Reumatoidea (AR). Material y métodos: Estudio de corte transversal. Se incluyeron pacientes ≥18 años de edad, con diagnóstico de AR según criterios ACR-EULAR 2010. Se consignaron datos sociodemográficos, comorbilidades, características clínicas y actividad de la enfermedad. Se administraron los cuestionarios EQ-5D-3L, QOL-RA II, HAQ-A y PHQ-9. A 20 pacientes se les re-administró el cuestionario a los 7 días de haber completado el primero para evaluar reproducibilidad. Análisis estadístico: Test T de Student, ANOVA, Chi². Correlación de Spearman. Alpha de Cronbach. Coeficiente de correlación intraclase. Regresión Logística Multinomial con modelo factorial completo. Regresión lineal múltiple. Resultados: Se incluyeron 430 pacientes, con un tiempo mediano (m) de evolución de 9 años (RIC: 4-16). La m del QOL-RA II fue 6,7 (RIC: 5,3-8). El tiempo promedio para completarlo fue de 1,7±0,57 minutos y para su cálculo de 12±1,7 segundos. Solo 9 (2,1%) pacientes no contestaron alguna pregunta. El cuestionario presentó excelente confiabilidad (α de Cronbach 0,97), reproducibilidad (CCI: 0,96) y buena correlación entre los diferentes ítems y el cuestionario total, sin evidencia de redundancia. QOL-RA II presentó además, buena correlación con EQ-5D-3L (Rho: 0,6), HAQ-A (Rho: 0,55) y PHQ-9 (Rho: 0,56) y moderada con los índices de actividad de la enfermedad DAS28-ERS (Rho: 0,38) y CDAI (Rho: 0,46). Se evidenció peor calidad de vida en aquellos pacientes que no realizaban actividad física (X 6,4±1,9 vs. 7±1,8, p <0,0001), en los desocupados (X 6,1±1,9 vs. 7±1,8, p <0,0001) y en los tabaquistas (X 6,2±1,7 vs. 6,7±1,9, p=0,03). Se observó una tendencia significativa a empeorar la calidad de vida a mayor actividad de la enfermedad. Ajustando por edad, sexo y tiempo de evolución de la enfermedad, las variables que se asociaron significativamente a peor calidad de vida fueron la desocupación, la mayor actividad de la enfermedad, la discapacidad funcional y la presencia de depresión. Conclusión: El QOL-RA II demostró buena validez de constructo, reproducibilidad. Fue fácil de completar y calcular. No se observó redundancia entre las preguntas ni influencia por la edad ni el tiempo de evolución de la enfermedad.

We have recently validated the Quality of Life-Rheumatoid Arthritis Scale (QOL-RA). We have found some limitations, that is why, with the author's permission, we have changed two questions and developed a new Spanish version, QOL-RA II. Objective: To validate the QOL-RA II in an Argentinean cohort of patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Material and methods: Cross-sectional study. Patients ≥18 years old, with a diagnosis of RA according to ACR-EULAR 2010 criteria were included. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, RA characteristics, disease activity current treatment were registered. Questionnaires were administered: EQ-5D-3L, QOL-RA, HAQ-A and PHQ-9. The QOL-RA II was re-administered in 20 patients to evaluate reproducibility. Statistical analysis: Student's T, ANOVA and Chi² tests. Spearman correlation. Cronbach's alpha. Reproducibility using ICC. Multinomial logistic regression with completed factorial model. Multiple linear regression. Results: 430 patients were included, with a median (m) disease duration of 8.9 years (IQR: 4-16). QOL-RA was m 6.6 (IQR: 5.3-8). Mean time to complete it was 1.7±0.57 minutes and to calculate it 12±17 seconds. Only 2.1% of the questionnaires presented missing answers. It showed very good reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.97), reproducibility (ICC: 0.96) and good correlation between the different items and the total questionnaire, without evidence of redundancy. Besides, QOL-RA II presented good correlation with EQ-5D-3L (Rho: 0.6), HAQ-A (Rho: 0.55) and PHQ-9 (Rho: 0.56) and moderate with DAS28-ESR (Rho: 0.38) and CDAI (Rho: 0.46). Worse quality of life was observed in patients not doing physical activity (X 6.4±1.9 vs. 7±1.8, p <0.0001), unemployed (X 6.1±1.9 vs. 7±1.8, p <0.0001) and current smokers (X 6.2±1.7 vs. 6.7±1.9, p=0.03). Patients with higher disease activity had a significant poorer quality of life. Adjusting by age, sex and disease duration, unemployment, higher disease activity, disability and the presence of depression were independently associated to worse quality of life. Conclusions: QOL-RA II demonstrated good construct validity, reproducibility and reliability. It was easy to complete and calculate. There were no redundancy between questions and it was not influenced by age and disease duration.

Validación del índice QOL-RA (Quality of Life-RheumatoidArthritis) en una cohorte argentina de pacientes con artritis reumatoidea / Validation of the Quality of Life-Rheumatoid Arthritis Scale (QOL-RA) in argentinean cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

El autocuestionario QOL-RA es una herramienta diseñada para valorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes con Artritis Reumatoidea (AR). No requiere licencia para su uso. Objetivo: Validar el cuestionario QOL-RA en una cohorte de pacientes con AR en Argentina. Material y métodos: Estudio de corte transversal. Se incluyeron pacientes ≥18 años de edad con diagnóstico de AR según criterios ACR-EuLAR 2010. Se consignaron datos sociodemográficos, comorbilidades, características de la enfermedad. Se completaron los cuestionarios QOL-RA, EQ 5D-3L, HAQ-A, PHQ-9. Se midió el tiempo para completar y calcular el QOL-RA. Análisis estadístico: Estadística descriptiva. Test T de Student, ANOvA, Chi2. Correlación de Spearman. Alpha de Cronbach. Coeficiente de correlación intraclase. Regresión Logística multinomial con modelo factorial completo. Regresión Lineal múltiple. Resultados: Se incluyeron 258 pacientes, 85,7% eran mujeres, con una edad mediana de 54 años (RIC 45-62). La mediana del QOL-RA fue 6,75 (RIC 5,4-8,1), presentando buena correlación con EQ 5D-3L (Rho: 0,63), HAQ-A (Rho: -0,56), PHQ9 (Rho: -0,54), SDAI (Rho: -0,45) y DAS28-ERS (Rho: -0,44). Peor calidad de vida se asoció con la presencia de comorbilidades (x6,4 ± 2 vs 7 ± 1,7, p=0,01) y no realizar actividad física (x6,7 ± 1,9 vs 7,1 ± 1,7, p=0,004). El tiempo para completar el cuestionario fue de x1,7 ± 0,42 minutos y para calcularlo de x12± 2,1 segundos. La confiabilidad y la reproducibilidad fueron buenas. Sin embargo, 4,3% de los cuestionarios presentaban alguna pregunta faltante y se observó redundancia entre las preguntas 3 y 6. En el análisis de regresión lineal múltiple usando QOL-RA como variable dependiente y ajustando para edad y tiempo de evolución, las variables que se asociaron independientemente a peor calidad de vida fueron: la discapacidad funcional, la actividad de la enfermedad y la presencia de depresión y comorbilidades. Conclusión: El cuestionario QOL-RA demostró buena validez de constructo, reproducibilidad y confiabilidad. Es fácil de completar y calcular. Sin embargo, dada la redundancia entre dos preguntas proyectamos cambiar una de ellas y re-testearlo